Home / Solutions / Legal & Privacy

DPAs, TIAs, and cross-border reviews in days, not weeks.

Your legal and privacy team shouldn't spend half its week negotiating bespoke DPAs and answering the same GDPR questions in 20 different jurisdictions. The Targhee agent drafts responses to privacy questionnaires with jurisdiction-aware citations, hosts your DPA and sub-processor list in a self-serve Trust Center, and keeps every binding answer under your review.

LP
Legal & Privacy Workspace — This week
Updated 2 min ago
Active
DPAs in review
4
TC accesses
68
Jurisdictions
14
Recent activity
QA
Enterprise SaaS — Privacy Q drafted
42/47
GDPR + CCPA · 94% avg confidence · awaiting counsel review
TC
EU customer pulled DPA + SCCs
3 docs
Marie L. · downloaded DPA + SCC Module 2 · 12 min ago
SP
Sub-processor added — Anthropic
38 notified
TC subscribers notified · 30-day objection window open
DPA
GlobalBank — DPA countersigned
Done
Template match · 2 redlines · 2-day turnaround
2-3d
DPA turnaround
(was: weeks)
95%
AI first-pass
accuracy
20+
US state privacy
laws tracked
24/7
Self-serve DPA +
sub-processors
§ 01 — The problem

Privacy work doesn't scale with a growing customer list.

Every enterprise customer wants a bespoke DPA. Every EU customer wants SCCs + a TIA. Every new US state privacy law adds a jurisdictional wrinkle. Every sub-processor you add to your stack triggers notifications to every customer contract. And your legal team is one or two people.

3wk
Typical DPA negotiation

Every DPA is a three-week drag

Every enterprise customer wants bespoke red-lines on your DPA. Each round is a week. Your counsel ends up doing the same negotiation with every new logo, and the deal slips quarter to quarter.

20+
US state privacy laws

Jurisdictions pile up faster than updates

GDPR, UK GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, and 20+ US state privacy laws — each with different lawful bases, rights requests, and vendor obligations. Your knowledge base goes stale the week after you update it.

100+
Customer contracts per sub-processor change

Adding one sub-processor notifies everyone

Switch from one analytics vendor to another, and every customer DPA needs notification. Miss the 30-day window and you're in breach. Manage this in email and you'll eventually miss one.

§ 02 — How privacy work changes

From bespoke to standardized.

Targhee lets a two-person legal function operate like a mid-tier privacy team. Your DPAs, SCCs, TIAs, and sub-processor lists live centrally. The repetitive drafting runs in the background. Every binding answer still gets counsel sign-off.

PQ
01

Privacy questionnaires, drafted

AI drafts 95%+ of privacy questionnaire answers with jurisdiction-aware citations — GDPR Article numbers, CCPA sections, state-specific rights. Your counsel reviews and ships.

DPA
02

DPA + SCCs on self-serve

Trust Center hosts your master DPA, SCC Module 2 and 3, UK IDTA addendum, and sub-processor list. EU customers pull their own copies without emailing legal.

SP
03

Sub-processor change management

One central sub-processor list. Add or remove a processor, and subscribed customers get notified automatically inside the contractual objection window. No more spreadsheet-driven mail merges.

JX
04

Jurisdiction-aware by default

GDPR, UK GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, 20+ US state privacy laws, LGPD, PIPEDA. Each answer maps to the right lawful basis, rights request procedure, and retention rule — not one-size-fits-all boilerplate.

TIA
05

TIAs without starting from zero

Transfer Impact Assessments for EU-to-US, UK-to-US, and third-country transfers, templated against your actual data flows. Update once, reuse across every customer who asks.

06

Audit trail on every binding answer

Every AI draft, counsel edit, and approval is timestamped. When a regulator or customer auditor asks how an answer was produced, the chain of custody is one click — including which counsel reviewed and when.

§ 03 — How it works

Three products. Privacy-flavored.

Inbound privacy questionnaires drafted with jurisdiction awareness, your DPA and sub-processors self-served from Trust Center, outbound privacy reviews for your own vendors — on one platform.

Privacy questionnaire automation

Privacy questionnaires, drafted with the right citation.

When a customer sends a privacy questionnaire — GDPR supplier assessment, CCPA vendor questionnaire, DPA negotiation request, or a state-law-specific form — Targhee reads it, drafts answers with jurisdiction-aware regulatory citations, and flags items where the lawful basis, data categories, or transfer mechanism genuinely depend on the customer relationship. Counsel reviews and ships.

  • GDPR, UK GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, and 20+ US state laws cited at the Article/section level
  • EU-US DPF, SCCs 2021/914, and UK IDTA language pulled from your master DPA
  • Jurisdiction flags surface when an answer differs EU vs UK vs US
  • Nothing binding ships without counsel approval
Explore Questionnaire Automation →
Privacy Questionnaire Inbox
Q1 2026 · 5 in pipeline
2 in progress
Company
Framework
Due
Status
EuroMarketing GmbH
EU customer · DE
GDPR DPA
Mar 28
Done
California Health Ins.
US payer · CA
CCPA · 34q
Apr 2
Review
UK Retailer Ltd.
UK customer · LON
UK GDPR + IDTA
Apr 10
Drafting
Texas Fintech Co.
US customer · TX
TDPSA · 28q
Apr 15
Queued
1 done · 2 in progress · 2 queued · avg 2-day turnaround
Trust Center

DPA, SCCs, sub-processors — customers serve themselves.

The fastest DPA is the one your customer can pull from your Trust Center at 2am on a Friday. Your master DPA, SCC Modules 2 and 3, UK IDTA addendum, and live sub-processor list sit behind a click-wrap NDA. EU customers get their SCCs without waiting for a counsel email. Sub-processor changes trigger automatic notifications to subscribed customers.

  • Master DPA, SCCs, UK IDTA, and sub-processor list — versioned and timestamped
  • Click-wrap NDA auto-signed before any DPA access
  • Sub-processor changes push notifications inside the contractual objection window
  • Access logs show which customer pulled which version, when
Explore Trust Center →
Trust Center · Privacy docs
Last 90 days
168
Customer accesses
52
EU / UK customers
−82%
DPA email threads
Top accessed documents
DPA
Master Data Processing Agreement
v3.2 · issued Jan 2026
54 ↓
SCC
EU SCCs — Module 2 (C2P)
Decision 2021/914 · current
41 ↓
SP
Sub-processor list
Last update Mar 12 · 14 entries
38 ↓
UK
UK IDTA Addendum
ICO v1.0 · signed template
22 ↓
Outbound vendor privacy reviews

Your own sub-processors, vetted and tracked.

Your legal team owes its own customers the same rigor you demand from vendors. Targhee gives you a privacy-specific template library — DPA review, TIAs, Article 28 processor obligations, jurisdiction-specific addenda — to send to your sub-processors, tracks responses, and flags gaps with regulatory references. Evidence lives in one place for auditors and for customer due-diligence requests.

  • Article 28 processor obligations, DPA negotiations, and SCC module checks
  • Automated reminders — no manual chasing of DPA redlines
  • AI scores every response, flags jurisdictional gaps
  • Every assessment timestamped for your own audit trail
Explore Vendor Risk Assessment →
Sub-processor portfolio · Q1 2026
14 active
AW
Cloud hosting provider
88/100
DPA signed · SCCs Module 3 · EU regions only · next review Mar 2027
AN
AI model provider
72/100
DPA signed · TIA pending · transfer mechanism under review
AN
Analytics tool
58/100
Article 28 gap · processor terms missing audit clause · remediation requested
EM
Email delivery service
81/100
DPF certified · US-EU transfers covered · auto-reassessment scheduled
§ 04 — Who it helps

Every role on the legal team.

From Chief Legal Officer to Privacy Counsel to the DPO, Targhee removes the drafting overhead from the work that takes the most time — and leaves the strategic judgment where it belongs.

CL
Chief Legal Officer · GC

Close deals faster, reduce privacy exposure

The two biggest drags on your function — DPA negotiation cycles and jurisdictional sprawl — handled by one agent. Your team runs leaner, your customers close quicker, and your board gets a cleaner privacy risk picture.

DPA turnaround visible to leadership and sales
Sub-processor and cross-border risk at a glance
Trust Center analytics show which customers pulled which terms
PC
Privacy Counsel

Stop redrafting the same DPA clause

The repetitive parts of privacy work — drafting GDPR responses, negotiating standard DPA redlines, answering state-law questionnaires, notifying sub-processor changes — happen in the background. You review binding language, not retype it.

AI handles first-pass privacy questionnaires with citations
Sub-processor notifications go out automatically
Trust Center keeps DPA + SCCs self-serve
DO
Data Protection Officer

Track every jurisdiction, on one dashboard

GDPR Article 30 ROPA, Article 28 processor obligations, DPIAs, TIAs, and US state-law equivalents — all tracked centrally with timestamped evidence for supervisory authorities and internal reporting.

20+ US state privacy laws tracked as they take effect
TIAs templated per transfer corridor (EU→US, UK→US, etc.)
Audit-ready evidence chain for every binding answer
§ 05 — The platform

Three products. All three matter to legal.

Legal and privacy teams use all three products: inbound privacy questionnaire automation, proactive DPA and sub-processor sharing via Trust Center, and outbound assessments of your own sub-processors. One platform, one audit trail.

§ 06 — Questions

What legal teams ask us.

Common privacy questions.

Specific to your jurisdiction mix, sub-processor portfolio, or DPA template? Drop it in a demo — we'll walk through your actual DPA against Targhee's setup and show you exactly where time gets returned.

Book a demo →
GDPR, UK GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, and the 20 US states with comprehensive privacy laws in force as of 2026 — California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oregon, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas (TDPSA), Utah, Virginia, and Washington. International: LGPD (Brazil), PIPEDA (Canada), Australia Privacy Act. Transfer mechanisms: EU-US DPF, 2021 EU SCCs (Modules 2 & 3), UK IDTA. We track new state laws as they're enacted and update the knowledge base with citation-level precision.
Yes — and you should. Upload your master DPA, redline playbook, and standard fallback positions. Targhee hosts the current signed version in your Trust Center for customer self-serve, tracks version history, and uses your own clauses as the source of truth for AI-drafted answers. Your SCCs, UK IDTA addendum, and DPF certification live in the same place, versioned together.
One central sub-processor list lives in Trust Center. When you add or change a sub-processor, customers who opted into your notification list get alerted automatically — inside the contractual objection window your DPA specifies (typically 30 days). Changes are timestamped and the notification history is audit-ready. This eliminates the mail-merge spreadsheet that most privacy teams still run manually.
TIAs can be templated per transfer corridor — EU→US under DPF, EU→US under SCCs where DPF doesn't apply, UK→US under IDTA, EU→other-third-country. Your baseline assessment (government access analysis, technical safeguards, contractual supplementary measures) is authored once and reused for each customer who asks. When you add a sub-processor in a new jurisdiction, the TIA surfaces the relevant assessment rather than requiring a fresh analysis.
No — different scope. OneTrust, TrustArc, and similar privacy management platforms handle consent management, cookie banners, DSAR workflows, and full ROPA tooling. Targhee automates the privacy-questionnaire-and-DPA workflow — answering inbound privacy questionnaires, hosting DPAs and sub-processor lists, assessing your own sub-processors. Teams with significant B2C volume typically need both: OneTrust for consumer-facing privacy ops, Targhee for B2B customer and vendor workflows. If you're B2B-only and spending on questionnaire drafting and DPA negotiation, Targhee may cover most of what you actually need.
Generic LLMs don't know your DPA, your sub-processors, your transfer mechanisms, or your state-law posture — and they hallucinate regulatory citations confidently. Targhee is purpose-built for privacy workflows: jurisdiction-aware citations validated against current regulatory text, format-aware questionnaire parsing (Excel, PDF, portals), mandatory source citations, confidence scoring, counsel approval gates, and full audit trail for every binding answer. Teams that try to DIY with ChatGPT typically spend 6+ months and land with a workflow their counsel won't sign off on.
All customer data is processed in an isolated, encrypted environment. Your DPAs, questionnaires, and privacy documentation never train third-party models. We're an early-stage company and transparent about it — we're building toward SOC 2 Type II, and we're happy to walk through our current security posture, data handling architecture, and compliance roadmap on the call so your counsel can decide whether it's ready for your risk tolerance today.

Do more privacy work. With the same counsel headcount.

Bring a real DPA negotiation or a real privacy questionnaire to the demo — your hardest customer, your messiest jurisdiction — and we'll show you exactly how Targhee handles it against your own materials.

Live in a day · All three products included · 20-minute demo